Eclecticism



The term “Eclecticism” means the practice of deriving ideas, style, or taste from a broad and diverse range of sources.

Eclecticism is a conceptual approach that does not hold rigidly to a single paradigm or set of assumptions, but instead draws upon multiple theories, styles, or ideas to gain complementary insights into a subject, or applies different theories in particular cases.

It can sometimes seem inelegant or lacking in simplicity, and eclectics are sometimes criticized for lack of consistency in their thinking. It is, however, common in many fields of study. For example, most psychologists accept certain aspects of behaviorism, but do not attempt to use the theory to explain all aspects of human behavior.

Eclecticism in ethics, philosophy, and religion is also known as syncretism.

In simpler words, it means giving every theory, using every idea, trying every possible thing, and basically, just throwing stones at a wall and waiting to see which one sticks.

And how could you really accept something that is mostly used in fields like philosophy, psychology, ethics and RELIGION!

It’s like saying, Covid-19 is a man-made virus, a naturally existing virus, a virus made by aliens, and every other damn theory one can cook up and waiting to see which one sticks. And when it is proved to be one of the 100 (which it obviously will), then going out there and saying, look, I was right!

Yes, of course you were. A broken clock is right twice a day!

But people hale the Eclectics over the Eccentrics. And that is the entire problem with our world.

People don’t want to open their minds to odd and unconventional ideas. But they are all good with thousands of theories concerning one particular topic just because it gives them a choice to believe what they like.

And eccentrics are considered to be the odd ones out. And that is why we can never fit into the society. We are socially awkward. Yes! But it’s not like we were given a choice.

Whenever we give a theory or idea based on sheer observations, calculations and facts, we are sidelined and termed as crazy!

But when an eclectic says, this thing could be happening because of (1000 different reasons) any of the given reasons without any particular proof and eligibility, he is considered to be the saviour.

Sometimes (most of the times), a person like that is also made the President or Prime Minister.

P.S. Eclecticism might be a good thing, but only if it is confined to the field of art. Don’t! I repeat. Don’t bring it into Science! It will be catastrophic.

Categories: science

9 replies

  1. Eclecticism could produce more holistic theories and sounder evidence bases as it reduces the reductionist and, in my opinion insane, view that everything exists in isolated silos. A policeman breaking a leg has physical, psychological and societal implications. Physical is obvious plus potential muscle wastage, psychologically there’s a risk of depression and other mental distress as he’s no longer mobile, able to do his job which narrows social interactions etc and societal because there’s now one less police officer catching criminals and keeping country safe. The reductionist view of a broken leg stops at physical implications as it’s in the physical injury silo.

    Eclecticism when researching is amazing I wish more people would do it.

    As for the cause of Covid19 the virus it’s highly likely it was the result of buck passing, societal prejudice towards homeless and greed. Unfortunately there are also other more insidious and borderline criminal elements that have come into play concerning how coronavirus is controlled.

    I base my views on coronavirus on my evidence based observations and the fact that I reported the first raw sewage leak and know exactly who was frequenting that area, and other strong valid evidence bases.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. There is a scientific sense in which eclecticism is essential—as the engine of evolution. Speciation requires variation (by recombination, for example) or mutation. If you’re open to the notion that consciousness is evolving — in an authentically scientific sense, not just figuratively speaking (e.g., see unividualism) — then fringe ideas are the raw material on which the evolutionary engine acts. The old science with which we have been indoctrinated can’t very comfortably accommodate this new epoch in cosmic evolution yet, so eclectic silliness like conspiracy theories can’t be comfortably considered as hypotheses evaluated by our evolving scientific method. Let’s have some humility and “call bullshit” on our limited scientific method and the knowledge it has yielded. Two phrases: Dark matter, dark energy. Spooky action at a distance

    Like

  3. Is it “eclecticism” for findings in one area of science to inform another area? If so, it can’t be all bad and if not, then what does eclecticism really mean?

    Like

Leave a Reply to your's_Nomison Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s